Where two reputable sources disagree on a value or claim, Zultpedia presents both with attribution and source-tier marking, than picking one. Example: Wikipedia gives diaspore's specific gravity as 3.1–3.4; Zultanite Gems LLC publishes 3.39 for gem-grade material. Both appear on the property guide with sources cited. Editors do not silently rewrite history; corrections are dated and acknowledged publicly.

Why this is published

The Zultpedia Editorial Board signs methodology entries to make the editorial standards of the archive transparent. Readers should understand how facts get into the archive, what evidence supports them, and how disagreements among sources are handled.

How this applies in practice

Apply this to any specific entry on Zultpedia by checking the source-priority tier, citation list, and last-fact-checked date at the foot of the entry. Where ambiguity exists, the methodology page is the canonical reference.

Reporting an issue

If you have spotted an error or believe a source is mis-attributed, write to the editors. Corrections are acknowledged publicly and dated.